In order of decreasing age (there are some pictures still
yet to be taken, others are fuzzy, and the 3d stuff is pretty
goofy - at least until we get a good VR stand):
 |
An HP-35
(1973): The first scientific pocket calculator (way cool!
Thanks Susan). This is a version 2 model with the raised
bump on the "5" key but no red dot. As an added
bonus, it has the ROM bugs like e^x (ln 2.02) = 2, which
were corrected in most 35's by a recall. (Read more at
the HP calculator
museum.) |
| |
|
 |
A TI SR-11
(1973): SR stood for "slide rule!" While far
from the power of the HP-35, it was considerably less
expensive and featured a square root function (as well
as reciprocal and square). (Read more at the Datamath
calculator museum.) |
| |
|
 |
A TI
SR-50 (1974): This was TI's answer to the HP-35.
At about half the cost of the 35 and a few more functions
(note the hyperbolics) it was very successful. Even more
interesting, this was one of the first calculators
to
implement "algebraic logic" (i.e. operator
precedence) where 1 + 2 x 3 gives you 7, not 9. (Read
more at the
Datamath
calculator museum.) |
| |
|
 |
A Corvus
322 (1974): Not a scientific, but an early basic function
model (with memory!). Despite their unique styling, Corvus
only produced calculators for a few years. What's interesting
about this model is how the memory works (hint: you have
to hit the "M" key first to perform any memory
manipulation). |
| |
|
 |
An HP-21
(1975): The next iteration of the HP-35. It was amazing
in its day for its small size - you can see it in 3d here
(requires Apple's quicktime software). (Read more at the
HP calculator
museum.) |
| |
|
 |
A Kings Point
SC-20 (197?): OK, I have no idea when this calculator
was made and there's very little information about King's
Point out there (they didn't last long). I had an SC-20
in junior high school, so that would put it somewhere
around here on the list. Unfortunately, this isn't the
same machine - my first one was a casualty of my curiosity,
and it took me another quarter century (sigh) to find
another. Looking inside, it's probably easy to see why
King's Point went out of business - the whole thing is
hand soldered! It must have taken hours to put together.
But it has a good solid feel, a nice keyboard, and is
a pleasant machine to work with. |
| |
|
 |
A Kings Point SC-40 (197?): Like the SC-20, I have little information on this one (even the owner's manual doesn't have a date). It's similar to the SC-20, but despite the larger model number it's missing a few functions compared to the SC-20 (like factorials). On the other hand it seems to be a later manufacture (more integration on the cpu board) and sports a 10 digit display (+2) versus the 8(+2) of the SC-20. I need to get in there and change out the nicads, so I'll try and get a date off the chips too. |
| |
|
 |
A Radio Shack EC-4001
(1977): Before you laugh, I should point out that it's
a re-branded Sinclar Cambridge Programmable - well known
for being one of the least accurate calculators ever made.
And I don't mean the occasional error - the algorithms
it uses are just fundamentally bad (cos(Pi/3) = 0.5002651!).
Never trust it to more than 4 digits. But still, it's
cool, and was amazingly small and powerful for 1977. |
| |
|

 |
An HP-67
(1977): I can remember playing with one of these in a
store when they first came out and thinking it was
one of the most remarkable devices I had ever held.
224 program steps, 26 storage registers (26! that's
more than anyone would ever need), and the ability
to read/write everything to magnetic cards. Remember,
this was back before CMOS memory was widely used,
and everyone's calculators forgot your work when you
turned them off. They were about $500 back then, so
there was no way a 14 year old kid was ever going
to get one, and sure enough, it took me another 25
years. You can see it in 3d here
(requires Apple's quicktime software). (Read more at
the
HP calculator
museum.) |
| |
|
 |
An HP-97 (1978): This
is the desktop version of the HP-67 (just above). Although
it is portable (including rechargable
batteries) it's a bit much to put in your pocket - or
backpack for that matter!. (Read more at
the
HP calculator
museum.) |
| |
|
 |
A Radio Shack EC-4000 Programmable
Calculator (1978). This is really a re-branded TI-57
(only the label is different). Produced from 1977 to 1982,
the 57 was the low end of the 57/58/59 series (8 memories
and 50 merged program steps). (Read more at the Datamath
calculator museum.) |
| |
|
 |
A Sharp EL-5100 (1979):
Simply a classic. When people talk about extraordinary
design, this is it! I actually bought this one for myself
when I was in high school. At the time, I didn't have
the money for an HP and I preferred the Sharp design/features
to the Ti's (that still holds true today). |
| |
|
 |
A Sharp EL-208 (1979):
Not really a scientific, but there's something cute about
an LCD calc that needs a 9V battery! It's tiny and oddly
shaped to boot. |
| |
|
 |
A TI-55 (1979): What can
I say. It's the mini-van of the late 1970's calcs. Well,
that and the Ti-30 (the 30 was the 4 cylinder mini-van,
the 55 was the V-6). (Learn more about it at the Datamath
museum.) |
| |
|


 |
A Radio Shack TRS-80 Pocket
Computer (PC-1) (1980?): One of the first pocket computers
(programs in BASIC), it's really a Sharp PC-1211 with
the Radio Shack label on it (all their calculators and
pocket computers were made by 3rd parties). It can store
about 1400 steps and 26 memories and can even be interfaced
with a cassette tape recorder for storage of programs/data.
Internally it's even more interesting with 2 4-bit CPUs,
one for the display and one for the BASIC interpreter. |
| |
|
 |
A Sharp EL-512 (date
unknown): Little and pretty beat up. I'm not even sure
how I ended up with this one (I remember it from college,
I think). Still, a lot of power in a small package - it's
even programmable in a limited"recording keystrokes"
mode. |
| |
|
 |
An HP-33C (1980): This
was the bottom line of the "Spice" series programmable
scientifics. It's interesting to compare this to an HP-32C
(which I don't have) - notice the functions that were
removed in order to provide program registers (what! no
hyperbolics?). (Read more at the HP
calculator museum.) |
| |
|
 |
An HP-34C (1981): The
top of HP's "Spice" series, this one features
built in numerical integration and equation solving. 20
years ago!!! And the numbers flash while it's thinking,
which you really can't beat. You can see it in 3d here
(requires Apple's quicktime software). (Read more at the
HP calculator
museum.) |
| |
|

 |
An HP-41C (1981): This
was the first of the HP hand calculators to use an LCD
display rather than an LED. Even more remarkable was its
alphanumeric capabilities - calculators had pretty much
reached the point where they had more functions than could
be assigned to keys (note the 34C above, which has 4 functions
per key!). For the HP-41C, there were about twice as many
functions in ROM than you could get at from the keyboard.
These functions are called by putting the calculator into
"alpha" mode and typing in the name (later calculators
started using menus, like the 28C below). The calculator
itself is remarkably expandable (4 expansion ports) and
clearly one of the most significant calculator of the
early 1980's. You can see it in 3d here
(requires Apple's quicktime software). (Read more at the
HP calculator
museum.) |
| |
|
 |
A TI-58C (1981): They
made me buy this for college calculus. While it didn't
have "lots" of built in functions, it had a
lot of memory - program steps and register storage. You
could also get little "solid state modules"
that plugged into the back and added functions (programs).
A good work horse, but it never quite impressed me as
being as "interesting" as the HP and Sharp models
of the time. (Read more at the DataMath
Calculator Museum.) |
| |
|

 |
An HP-71B (1984): This
was one of HP's forays into the world of handheld "computers"
that were programmable in BASIC. But unlike the 75C/D,
the 71B had a separate numerical keyboard and a very
interesting
"CALC" mode with an oddly logical operator
precedence input mode (it is not an RPN calculator).
With about 17Kb RAM, 4 expansion slots, an optional
magnetic card reader and HP-IL interface, this was a
very powerful device (many saw service as portable data
collection/control systems). (Read more at the
HP calculator
museum.) |
| |
|
 |
An HP-11C (1985): The
HP 10 through 16 series is an interesting contrast to
the HP-41C/CV/CX - more of a replacement
for the 30 series and a traditional calculator (and at
$130, a lot cheaper). Despite its small size, it's a
remarkably capable machine and a favorite (along with
the 10, 15,
and 16) among collectors. (Read more at the
HP calculator
museum.) |
| |
|

 |
A Sharp EL-5150 (1986):
The rare updated version of the 5100.
This is tied with the HP-34c and HP-67 as my favorites,
although the way you enter equations is considerably different
from most calculators. Many functions are entered more
like you would read/write them, like <ln> <2>
= to find the the natural log of 2, which takes a lot
of getting used to (especially after having used RPN for
a while). |
| |
|
 |
An HP-28C (1987): I
bought this for myself as a present for passing my Ph.D.
qualifying exam. This was one of the first calculators
capable of doing symbolic math - including calculus! But
the 28C was somewhat limited by it's small about of memory.
I never really liked the on-screen menus though either
- I want buttons, lots and lots of buttons. The 28C (and
it's financial model cousin) were also HP's first calculators
to use the clamshell case. It turned out to be unpopular
because it made using the calculator while holding it
very difficult. (Read more at the HP
calculator museum.) |
| |
|
 |
A Sharp EL-5500II (1987?):
Hmmm. Programs in Basic plus has a regular calculator
mode which is quite powerful. This is a fun one! |
| |
|
 |
A Sharp EL-5500III
(198?): This is the last of the EL-5500 series of calculator/computers.
It has twice the RAM and a much larger ROM (almost double)
compared to the 5500II. |
| |
|
 |
An HP-48G (1996): OK,
this one shouldn't be here, but it is interesting to compare
this with the HP-35 above just to show how far things
progressed in the 23 year between them. But even for its
power, the 48 is a tough machine to use - almost too many
functions, many lost deep in menus within menus! |
Every now & then, I'll add another one to the collection, so check back if you've got absolutely nothing else going on in your life...